specialization: be important for international trade

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for international trade 1.00
be valuable for international trade 0.96
be valuable in international trade 0.96
affect international trade 0.96
be important for trade 0.94
be valuable for trade 0.88
be valuable in trade 0.87
affect trade 0.85
be important reason for trade 0.84
encourage trade between countries 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for international trade)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(specialization, affect international trade)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(specialization, affect international trade)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for trade)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect international trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for trade)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect international trade)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade)