specialization: affect trade

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect trade 1.00
affect international trade 0.93
be important for trade 0.91
affect trade between regions 0.87
be important for international trade 0.85
be valuable in trade 0.85
be common result of trade 0.85
encourage trade 0.85
be valuable for trade 0.84
be common result of free trade 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect international trade)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for trade)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade between regions)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(specialization, affect international trade)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(specialization, affect international trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for trade)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for trade)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect international trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade)