specialization: affect trade between regions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect trade between regions 1.00
encourage trade between countries 0.89
affect trade 0.87
affect international trade 0.83
be important for trade 0.83
be common result of trade 0.82
be common result of free trade 0.80
be important for international trade 0.79
encourage trade 0.78
be valuable in trade 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect international trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(specialization, affect international trade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(specialization, affect international trade)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for trade)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for trade)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for trade)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect international trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade between regions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(specialization, affect trade between regions)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade between regions)