specialization: be valuable in trade

Property	Similarity
be valuable in trade	1.00
be valuable for trade	1.00
be valuable in international trade	0.95
be valuable for international trade	0.95
be important for trade	0.93
be important for international trade	0.87
be valuable today	0.86
affect trade	0.85
affect international trade	0.83
be good idea in trade	0.82

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for international trade)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(specialization, be important for trade)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for trade)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(specialization, affect trade)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for international trade)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(specialization, be important for trade)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(specialization, affect international trade)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable today)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for trade)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(specialization, affect international trade)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable today)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect international trade)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for international trade)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable today)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for international trade)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable today)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(specialization, affect international trade)

Parents	thing Weight: 0.56 , factor Weight: 0.48 , program Weight: 0.48 , option Weight: 0.47
Siblings	facet Weight: 0.45 , characteristic Weight: 0.31 , niche Weight: 0.31 , design pattern Weight: 0.31 , socialization Weight: 0.31

specialization: be valuable in trade

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible