specialization: be valuable today

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valuable today 1.00
be valuable for trade 0.87
be valuable in trade 0.86
be valuable for international trade 0.82
be valuable in international trade 0.81
is useful 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(design pattern, is useful)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(design pattern, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable today)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(specialization, is useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(specialization, is useful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(specialization, is useful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable today)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable today)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(design pattern, is useful)