specialization: be valuable in international trade

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valuable in international trade 1.00
be valuable for international trade 1.00
be important for international trade 0.96
be valuable in trade 0.95
be valuable for trade 0.95
affect international trade 0.91
be important for trade 0.91
affect trade 0.83
be valuable today 0.81
be common result of free trade 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(specialization, affect international trade)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(specialization, affect international trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect international trade)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect international trade)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable today)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable today)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable today)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable today)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade)