specialization: be valuable for trade

Property	Similarity
be valuable for trade	1.00
be valuable in trade	1.00
be valuable for international trade	0.95
be valuable in international trade	0.95
be important for trade	0.93
be important for international trade	0.88
be valuable today	0.87
affect trade	0.84
affect international trade	0.83
be good idea in trade	0.82

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for international trade)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in international trade)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for trade)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(specialization, be important for trade)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for international trade)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in international trade)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(specialization, be important for trade)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(specialization, affect trade)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable today)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(specialization, affect international trade)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for trade)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(specialization, affect international trade)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable today)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect international trade)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in international trade)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for international trade)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable today)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in international trade)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for international trade)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable today)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(specialization, affect international trade)

Parents	thing Weight: 0.56 , factor Weight: 0.48 , program Weight: 0.48 , option Weight: 0.47
Siblings	facet Weight: 0.45 , characteristic Weight: 0.31 , niche Weight: 0.31 , design pattern Weight: 0.31 , socialization Weight: 0.31

specialization: be valuable for trade

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible