specialization: be good idea in trade

Property	Similarity
be good idea in trade	1.00
is good idea	0.88
be important for trade	0.87
be important reason for trade	0.86
is idea	0.83
be important for international trade	0.82
be valuable for trade	0.82
encourage trade	0.82
be valuable in trade	0.82
affect trade	0.82

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(specialization, is idea)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(specialization, encourage trade)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(specialization, is good idea)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(specialization, affect trade)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(specialization, is idea)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(specialization, is good idea)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(specialization, is good idea)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(specialization, is good idea)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for trade)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(specialization, is idea)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(specialization, be important for trade)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(specialization, encourage trade)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(specialization, be important for trade)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(specialization, is idea)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for trade)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade)

Parents	thing Weight: 0.56 , factor Weight: 0.48 , program Weight: 0.48 , option Weight: 0.47
Siblings	facet Weight: 0.45 , characteristic Weight: 0.31 , niche Weight: 0.31 , design pattern Weight: 0.31 , socialization Weight: 0.31

specialization: be good idea in trade

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible