specialization: be important reason for trade

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important reason for trade 1.00
be important for trade 0.89
be good idea in trade 0.86
be important for international trade 0.84
be valuable for trade 0.82
be common result of free trade 0.82
affect trade 0.82
be valuable in trade 0.81
be common result of trade 0.81
be valuable for international trade 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for trade)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for trade)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be common result of trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade)