specialization: be common result of free trade

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be common result of free trade 1.00
be common result of trade 0.96
be important for trade 0.86
affect trade 0.84
affect international trade 0.83
be important for international trade 0.83
encourage trade between countries 0.82
be valuable for trade 0.82
be important reason for trade 0.82
be valuable in trade 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect international trade)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(specialization, be common result of trade)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(specialization, affect international trade)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(specialization, affect international trade)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for trade)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for trade)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for trade)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable in trade)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect international trade)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade)