specialization: encourage trade

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
encourage trade 1.00
encourage trade between countries 0.93
be important for trade 0.85
affect trade 0.85
be good idea in trade 0.82
affect international trade 0.82
be important for international trade 0.81
be common result of free trade 0.80
be valuable for trade 0.80
be important reason for trade 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(specialization, encourage trade)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specialization, affect trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect trade)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for trade)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be good idea in trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect international trade)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important reason for trade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(specialization, affect international trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(specialization, be good idea in trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(specialization, affect trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(specialization, encourage trade between countries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect international trade)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for trade)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(specialization, be common result of free trade)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important reason for trade)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(specialization, affect international trade)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for trade)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(specialization, be good idea in trade)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(specialization, be good idea in trade)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(specialization, be important reason for trade)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for trade)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialization, be important reason for trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(specialization, encourage trade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, encourage trade)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(specialization, encourage trade)