specialization: be important in economics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in economics 1.00
be important in study of economics 0.94
be important in business 0.77
be important in agriculture 0.77
be important to economy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in economics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(niche, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in economics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(niche, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(niche, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in economics)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in study of economics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in agriculture)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in study of economics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(specialization, be important to economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in study of economics)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important to economy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(specialization, be important to economy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in agriculture)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in study of economics)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in agriculture)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in agriculture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in economics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(niche, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(specialization, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)