specialization: be important in agriculture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in agriculture 1.00
be important to economy 0.77
be important in economics 0.77
be beneficial to economy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in agriculture)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(specialization, be important to economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in economics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(specialization, be important to economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in economics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important to economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in economics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in agriculture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(specialization, be important in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in agriculture)