specialization: be beneficial to economy

Related concepts

Parents	thing Weight: 0.56 , factor Weight: 0.48 , program Weight: 0.48 , option Weight: 0.47
Siblings	facet Weight: 0.45 , characteristic Weight: 0.31 , niche Weight: 0.31 , design pattern Weight: 0.31 , socialization Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be beneficial to economy	1.00
be important to economy	0.91
affect economy	0.89
make economy efficient	0.84
make economy more efficient	0.82
be important in business	0.78
be advantageous	0.76
be important in agriculture	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(niche, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(niche, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(niche, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(specialization, affect economy)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(specialization, affect economy)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(specialization, affect economy)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(specialization, make economy efficient)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect economy)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(specialization, be important to economy)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(specialization, make economy more efficient)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(specialization, be advantageous)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(specialization, be important to economy)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(specialization, make economy efficient)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(specialization, make economy more efficient)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(specialization, make economy efficient)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(specialization, make economy efficient)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(specialization, be important to economy)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(specialization, make economy more efficient)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in agriculture)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in business)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(specialization, make economy more efficient)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(specialization, be advantageous)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(specialization, be advantageous)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be advantageous)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(specialization, be important in business)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(specialization, be important in agriculture)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in business)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(specialization, be important in business)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in agriculture)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(specialization, be important in agriculture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(niche, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)