specialization: affect economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect economy 1.00
be important to economy 0.93
be beneficial to economy 0.89
make economy efficient 0.82
make economy more efficient 0.81
affect employment patterns 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(specialization, affect economy)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(specialization, make economy efficient)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(specialization, make economy efficient)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect employment patterns)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(specialization, affect employment patterns)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(specialization, be important to economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(specialization, make economy efficient)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(specialization, be important to economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important to economy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(specialization, make economy efficient)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(specialization, affect employment patterns)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect employment patterns)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(specialization, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(specialization, affect economy)