specialization: be important to economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to economy 1.00
affect economy 0.93
be beneficial to economy 0.91
make economy efficient 0.87
make economy more efficient 0.85
be important in business 0.80
be important in agriculture 0.77
be important in operation of market 0.75
be important in economics 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(specialization, be important to economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(niche, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important to economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(niche, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(niche, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(specialization, be important to economy)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(specialization, affect economy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect economy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect economy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(specialization, affect economy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(specialization, make economy efficient)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(specialization, make economy efficient)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(specialization, make economy efficient)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(specialization, make economy efficient)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in agriculture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in operation of market)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in operation of market)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in economics)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in economics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in economics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in operation of market)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in operation of market)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in agriculture)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in agriculture)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in agriculture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(specialization, be important to economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(niche, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(specialization, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)