specialization: make economy efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
make economy efficient 1.00
make economy more efficient 0.99
be important to economy 0.87
be beneficial to economy 0.84
affect economy 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(specialization, make economy efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(specialization, affect economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(specialization, affect economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(specialization, make economy more efficient)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(specialization, affect economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(specialization, affect economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(specialization, be important to economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(specialization, be important to economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important to economy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(specialization, make economy efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(specialization, make economy efficient)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(specialization, make economy efficient)