nigeria: is failed state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.60
, country
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.58
, africa
Weight: 0.57
Siblings ghana
Weight: 0.66
, mali
Weight: 0.46
, zambia
Weight: 0.36
, zimbabwe
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is failed state 1.00
has state state 0.77
be called state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is failed state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is failed state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(nigeria, is failed state)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(nigeria, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(nigeria, be called state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(nigeria, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(nigeria, be called state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(nigeria, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(nigeria, has state state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, be called state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is failed state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(nigeria, is failed state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is failed state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, has state state)