zimbabwe: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.52
, united states
Weight: 0.52
Siblings zambia
Weight: 0.36
, central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, malta
Weight: 0.35
, nigeria
Weight: 0.35
, ethiopia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
has state third 0.81
is failed state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is failed state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(zambia, has state third)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is failed state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(central african republic, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(central african republic, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nigeria, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(nigeria, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nigeria, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nigeria, is failed state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(central african republic, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is failed state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(zambia, has state third) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(zambia, has state third)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is failed state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, is failed state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state third)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is failed state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(zimbabwe, has state third)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is failed state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, has state third)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, has state third)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(central african republic, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(nigeria, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(nigeria, is failed state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(central african republic, is failed state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(zambia, has state third)