:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(brand, advertise)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nike, advertise)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(nike, advertise)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(brand, advertise)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(nike, advertise)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(brand, advertise)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(nike, advertise)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, advertise)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(nike, advertise)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(nike, advertise)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(nike, advertise)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nike, advertise)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(nike, advertise)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(brand, advertise)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(nike, advertise)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pepsi, advertise)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child