nike: spend on advertising

Related concepts

Parents	brand Weight: 0.62 , shoe Weight: 0.62 , product Weight: 0.61 , client Weight: 0.55 , name Weight: 0.54
Siblings	chanel Weight: 0.34 , pepsi Weight: 0.34 , hermes Weight: 0.34 , oxford Weight: 0.34 , burberry Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
spend on advertising	1.00
advertise	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(brand, advertise) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(nike, spend on advertising)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(brand, advertise)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(brand, advertise)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(pepsi, advertise)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(brand, advertise) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(nike, spend on advertising)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(pepsi, advertise) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(pepsi, advertise)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(nike, spend on advertising)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(nike, advertise)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(nike, advertise)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(nike, advertise)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(nike, advertise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(nike, spend on advertising)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(nike, spend on advertising)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(brand, advertise)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(pepsi, advertise)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(nike, spend on advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(brand, advertise)