nike: be good company work for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.62
, shoe
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.61
, client
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chanel
Weight: 0.34
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, hermes
Weight: 0.34
, oxford
Weight: 0.34
, burberry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good company work for 1.00
go out of business 0.79
be out of business 0.78
was chosen as name of shoe manufacturing company 0.76
be bad for environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be good company work for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pepsi, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be good company work for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(nike, be good company work for)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(nike, go out of business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(nike, go out of business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(nike, be out of business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(nike, go out of business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(nike, be out of business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(nike, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(nike, was chosen as name of shoe manufacturing company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nike, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(nike, be out of business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(nike, was chosen as name of shoe manufacturing company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(nike, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nike, was chosen as name of shoe manufacturing company)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nike, go out of business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(nike, was chosen as name of shoe manufacturing company)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(nike, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nike, be out of business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(nike, be good company work for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(nike, be good company work for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(nike, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pepsi, be good company work for)