nike: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.62
, shoe
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.61
, client
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chanel
Weight: 0.34
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, hermes
Weight: 0.34
, oxford
Weight: 0.34
, burberry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
be good company work for 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nike, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(client, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(client, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be good company work for)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(nike, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pepsi, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be good company work for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(nike, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nike, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nike, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(nike, be good company work for)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(nike, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(nike, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(nike, be good company work for)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nike, be good company work for)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(nike, be good company work for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(nike, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nike, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(client, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pepsi, be good company work for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nike, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(client, has quality bad)