nike: get burnt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.62
, shoe
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.61
, client
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chanel
Weight: 0.34
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, hermes
Weight: 0.34
, oxford
Weight: 0.34
, burberry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get burnt 1.00
is is burned 0.90
is are burned 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(product, is is burned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(nike, get burnt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(product, is is burned)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(product, is is burned)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(product, is is burned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(nike, get burnt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(nike, get burnt)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(nike, is is burned)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(nike, is is burned)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nike, is is burned)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(nike, is are burned)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(nike, is are burned)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nike, is is burned)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(nike, is are burned)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nike, is are burned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(nike, get burnt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(nike, get burnt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(product, is is burned)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(nike, get burnt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(product, is is burned)