nip: is bad now

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.45
, thing
Weight: 0.43
, conference
Weight: 0.37
, team
Weight: 0.35
Siblings beat
Weight: 0.29
, bud
Weight: 0.29
, nail clipper
Weight: 0.29
, nail polish
Weight: 0.29
, taste bud
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad now 1.00
has quality bad 0.84
is fucking bad 0.80
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(conference, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nip, is bad now)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beat, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beat, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail clipper, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(conference, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(nip, is bad now)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(nail polish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(beat, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(nail polish, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nail clipper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(nail clipper, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(beat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(beat, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(nip, is bad now)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(nip, is fucking bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(nip, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nip, is fucking bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(nip, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(nip, is fucking bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(nip, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(nip, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(nip, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nip, is fucking bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(nip, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(nip, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(nip, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nip, is bad now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(conference, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beat, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(nail clipper, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(beat, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(nail polish, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(nip, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(conference, has quality bad)