no: be in scientific notation important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.60
, free radical
Weight: 0.60
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, player
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings nothing
Weight: 0.34
, any
Weight: 0.34
, anybody
Weight: 0.33
, only
Weight: 0.33
, f word
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in scientific notation important 1.00
be in scientific notation 0.99
be in scientific notation important in science 0.98
be in notation important in science 0.95
be in notation important 0.92
be in notation 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(no, be in scientific notation important)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(no, be in scientific notation)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(no, be in scientific notation)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(no, be in scientific notation)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(no, be in scientific notation)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(no, be in scientific notation important in science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(no, be in notation)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(no, be in notation)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(no, be in notation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(no, be in scientific notation important in science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(no, be in notation important in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(no, be in scientific notation important in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(no, be in notation important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(no, be in scientific notation important in science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(no, be in notation important in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(no, be in notation important in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(no, be in notation important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(no, be in notation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(no, be in notation important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(no, be in notation important in science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(no, be in notation important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(no, be in scientific notation important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(no, be in scientific notation important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(no, be in scientific notation important)