noise: be considered pollutant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.69
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, behavior
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.58
Siblings loud music
Weight: 0.71
, alarm clock
Weight: 0.67
, vacuum cleaner
Weight: 0.66
, jitter
Weight: 0.62
, siren
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered pollutant 1.00
be considered pollution 0.88
has state pollution 0.81
be improtant pollution 0.80
get polluted 0.77
pollute air 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(noise, be considered pollutant)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(noise, be considered pollution)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(noise, be considered pollution)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(noise, has state pollution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(noise, be improtant pollution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(noise, be considered pollution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(noise, get polluted)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(noise, pollute air)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(noise, pollute air)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(noise, get polluted)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(noise, be considered pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(noise, pollute air)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(noise, get polluted)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(noise, get polluted)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(noise, pollute air)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(noise, be improtant pollution)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(noise, has state pollution)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(noise, has state pollution)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(noise, be improtant pollution)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(noise, has state pollution)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(noise, be improtant pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(noise, be considered pollutant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollutant)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(noise, be considered pollutant)