noise: be considered pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.69
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, behavior
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.58
Siblings loud music
Weight: 0.71
, alarm clock
Weight: 0.67
, vacuum cleaner
Weight: 0.66
, jitter
Weight: 0.62
, siren
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered pollution 1.00
has state pollution 0.93
be improtant pollution 0.90
be considered pollutant 0.88
get polluted 0.81
pollute air 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(noise, be considered pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(noise, has state pollution)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(noise, be considered pollutant)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(noise, be improtant pollution)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(noise, be considered pollutant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(noise, pollute air)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(noise, get polluted)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(noise, get polluted)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(noise, be considered pollutant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(noise, pollute air)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(noise, pollute air)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(noise, get polluted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(noise, get polluted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(noise, be considered pollutant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(noise, pollute air)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(noise, has state pollution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(noise, be improtant pollution)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(noise, has state pollution)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(noise, be improtant pollution)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(noise, has state pollution)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(noise, be improtant pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(noise, be considered pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(noise, be considered pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(noise, be considered pollution)