nuclear fission: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.50
, source
Weight: 0.50
Siblings nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.36
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.36
, atomic bomb
Weight: 0.34
, atomic clock
Weight: 0.34
, nuke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(technology, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(technology, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(technology, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(technology, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality good)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality good)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nuke, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be bad for environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nuclear fission, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)