nuclear weapon: be developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical weapon
Weight: 0.80
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.75
, weapon
Weight: 0.73
, missile
Weight: 0.73
, ballistic missile
Weight: 0.67
Siblings atomic bomb
Weight: 0.79
, neutron bomb
Weight: 0.72
, hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.72
, cruise missile
Weight: 0.71
, trident
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be developed 1.00
is are developed 0.89
is built 0.80
be built 0.80
be created 0.78
were built 0.77
is invented 0.76
be constructed 0.76
was created 0.76
were developed during world war 1 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(weapon, is are developed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is built)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(weapon, were developed during world war 1)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(weapon, is invented)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(weapon, be developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(weapon, is are developed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(weapon, be created)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, is built)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(weapon, is are developed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be built)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is built)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were developed during world war 1)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, were built)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, was created)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be constructed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(weapon, is are developed)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is built)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(weapon, be created)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(atomic bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, were built)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be constructed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be constructed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(atomic bomb, was created)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, be developed)

Similarity expansion

0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be created)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be created)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, be created)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(weapon, be developed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(weapon, is are developed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(weapon, be created)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is built)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be constructed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, were built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, was created)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(weapon, be developed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(weapon, be created)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(weapon, is are developed)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nuclear weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is built)
...