nut: be good for heart

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.59
, source
Weight: 0.58
, magazine
Weight: 0.58
, plant
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macadamia nut
Weight: 0.81
, acorn
Weight: 0.63
, hazelnut
Weight: 0.63
, pecan
Weight: 0.62
, almond
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for heart 1.00
be good for brain 0.80
feel good 0.77
be good for health 0.77
be bad for kidneys 0.75
be bad for kidney stones 0.75
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(magazine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(nut, be good for heart)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(nut, be good for heart)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(magazine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magazine, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(almond, be good for brain)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pecan, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hazelnut, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(magazine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(nut, be good for heart)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(nut, be good for heart)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(almond, be good for brain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(almond, be good for brain)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hazelnut, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hazelnut, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pecan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pecan, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(almond, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(macadamia nut, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(nut, be good for heart)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for kidneys)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for brain)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(nut, be good for brain)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(nut, be bad for kidneys)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for kidney stones)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(nut, be good for heart)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(magazine, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(almond, be good for brain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hazelnut, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pecan, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(almond, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(nut, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(magazine, has quality good)