almond: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.62
, nut
Weight: 0.60
, peanut butter
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, grape
Weight: 0.37
, apple tree
Weight: 0.37
, macadamia nut
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
quality 0.89
is sooooooooooooooooooo good 0.87
be good for health 0.80
feel good 0.80
be good for us 0.80
has quality resources 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(almond, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nut, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(almond, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(almond, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peanut butter, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(almond, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(almond, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nut, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(almond, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nut, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(almond, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nut, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nut, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nut, be good for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(nut, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(peanut butter, be good for health)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nut, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nut, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for health)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(nut, feel good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(peanut butter, be good for health)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(almond, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nut, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(almond, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(almond, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(almond, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peanut butter, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(almond, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nut, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(almond, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nut, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(almond, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(macadamia nut, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pear, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(almond, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(almond, quality)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(almond, quality)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(almond, quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(almond, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nut, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nut, feel good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nut, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(nut, be good for health)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(peanut butter, be good for health)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(peanut butter, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nut, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nut, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(nut, be good for health)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(peanut butter, be good for health)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(almond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nut, feel good)