almond: quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.62
, nut
Weight: 0.60
, peanut butter
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, grape
Weight: 0.37
, apple tree
Weight: 0.37
, macadamia nut
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
quality 1.00
is quality 0.98
has quality good 0.89
has quality better 0.87
has quality bad 0.86
has quality resources 0.80
has quality judaism 0.79
is quality stardew valley 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(almond, quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(almond, quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nut, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(almond, quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit tree, has quality judaism)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(almond, quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nut, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nut, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, has quality judaism)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has quality judaism)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nut, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nut, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(peanut butter, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(almond, quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(almond, quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nut, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(almond, quality)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit tree, has quality judaism)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(almond, quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(macadamia nut, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pear tree, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(almond, quality)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(almond, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(almond, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(almond, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(almond, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(almond, quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has quality judaism)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nut, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nut, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(peanut butter, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nut, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nut, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(almond, quality)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has quality judaism)