oak tree: be at state park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.83
, tree
Weight: 0.77
, hardwood
Weight: 0.63
, vine
Weight: 0.61
, plant
Weight: 0.60
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.44
, pear tree
Weight: 0.43
, cherry tree
Weight: 0.42
, maple tree
Weight: 0.42
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at state park 1.00
be at park 0.91
be at in park 0.91
be at state of kansa 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(oak tree, be at state park)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(plant, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(oak tree, be at state park)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(oak tree, be at state park)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(oak tree, be at state park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tree, be at state park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, be at park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tree, be at in park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(plant, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at state park)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(plant, be at park)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at park)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(oak tree, be at state park)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(plant, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(oak tree, be at state park)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(oak tree, be at state park)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(oak tree, be at state park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(apple tree, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(oak tree, be at state park)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(oak tree, be at park)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(oak tree, be at park)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(oak tree, be at park)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(oak tree, be at state park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tree, be at state park)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be at in park)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tree, be at park)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plant, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tree, be at state park)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be at in park)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tree, be at park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plant, be at park)