tree: be at in park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77
, ficus
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in park 1.00
be at park 0.99
be at state park 0.91
be at garden center 0.78
be at in garden 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(vegetation, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be at in park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at park)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be at park)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at park)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at garden center)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(vegetation, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tree, be at in park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(oak tree, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(oak tree, be at park)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(apple tree, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at park)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ficus, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at park)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(oak tree, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(oak tree, be at state park)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(apple tree, be at garden center) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at garden center)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(tree, be at in park)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, be at park)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(tree, be at state park)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at state park)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tree, be at park)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at park)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tree, be at state park)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tree, be at park)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tree, be at in garden)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tree, be at state park)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tree, be at in garden)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(tree, be at in garden)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in garden)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be at in park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ficus, be at park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(oak tree, be at park)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(oak tree, be at state park)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at garden center)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(tree, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at park)