observation: be important to crime scene

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to crime scene 1.00
be important to crime investigation 0.82
be important for crime prevention research 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(observation, be important to crime scene)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(observation, be important to crime investigation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(observation, be important to crime investigation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(observation, be important to crime investigation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important to crime investigation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important to crime scene)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(observation, be important to crime scene)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)