evaluation: be important for crime prevention research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.66
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, document
Weight: 0.61
, discipline
Weight: 0.58
, recommendation
Weight: 0.57
Siblings appraisal
Weight: 0.60
, observation
Weight: 0.33
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, orientation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for crime prevention research 1.00
be important in research 0.82
be necessary in research 0.80
be needed in research 0.80
be important to crime investigation 0.79
research 0.78
be important in study of child development 0.77
be important to crime scene 0.77
be in research study 0.77
be important in human subjects research 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(consideration, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(consideration, be important in human subjects research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(recommendation, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recommendation, be in research study)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(recommendation, be important in research)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(consideration, be important in research)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(recommendation, be in research study)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(consideration, be important in human subjects research)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(consideration, be important in research)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, be in research study)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(consideration, be important in human subjects research)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, be important in research)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important to crime investigation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important to crime scene)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in study of child development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(observation, be needed in research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(documentation, be necessary in research)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(consideration, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(recommendation, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(consideration, be important in human subjects research)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recommendation, be in research study)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(documentation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(documentation, be necessary in research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(observation, be needed in research)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(observation, be needed in research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(observation, be important to crime investigation)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(observation, be important to crime investigation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(observation, be important in study of child development)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in study of child development)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(observation, be important to crime scene)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(observation, be important to crime scene)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(evaluation, research)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(evaluation, research)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(evaluation, research)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(recommendation, be important in research)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(recommendation, be in research study)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in research)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in human subjects research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(documentation, be necessary in research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(observation, be needed in research)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(observation, be important in study of child development)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(observation, be important to crime investigation)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(observation, be important to crime scene)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(recommendation, be important in research)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in research)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(recommendation, be in research study)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(evaluation, be important for crime prevention research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in human subjects research)