observation: have important to forensics science skills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have important to forensics science skills 1.00
interrelated in mathematics instruction 0.77
be important in biology 0.76
be in math 0.76
be important in psychology 0.76
is important skill 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(observation, have important to forensics science skills)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(outlier, be in math)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be important in biology)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be important in psychology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(observation, have important to forensics science skills)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(outlier, be in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(outlier, be in math)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(experiment, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(experiment, be important in psychology)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(experiment, be important in biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experiment, be important in biology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(observation, have important to forensics science skills)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(observation, be important in psychology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(observation, is important skill)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in psychology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in psychology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(observation, is important skill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(observation, is important skill)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(observation, be important in psychology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(observation, is important skill)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(observation, have important to forensics science skills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(outlier, be in math)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(experiment, be important in psychology)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, be important in biology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, have important to forensics science skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(activity, interrelated in mathematics instruction)