observation: need meaningful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need meaningful 1.00
need answerscom 0.78
be like imageoptin necessary 0.77
be important in theatre 0.77
is more useful 0.76
is necessary 0.76
needed can prove 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tool, be like imageoptin necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(observation, need meaningful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(instrument, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(observation, need meaningful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(instrument, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(instrument, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, is necessary)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(experiment, needed can prove)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tool, be like imageoptin necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(observation, need meaningful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(instrument, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(observation, need meaningful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(experiment, needed can prove) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(experiment, needed can prove)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(evaluation, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(evaluation, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(observation, need meaningful)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in theatre)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(observation, be important in theatre)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in theatre)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(observation, is more useful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(observation, is more useful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(observation, be important in theatre)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(observation, is more useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(observation, need meaningful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(observation, need meaningful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(instrument, is necessary)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(experiment, needed can prove)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(evaluation, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(instrument, is necessary)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(observation, need meaningful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)