observation: is more useful

Related concepts

Parents	activity Weight: 0.65 , instrument Weight: 0.61 , tool Weight: 0.61 , practice Weight: 0.61
Siblings	experiment Weight: 0.65 , outlier Weight: 0.53 , hipparchus Weight: 0.33 , evaluation Weight: 0.33 , telescope Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is more useful	1.00
is useful	0.95
were helpful to early people	0.79
be among most beneficial type	0.78
be more useful than telescopes	0.78
be among beneficial type	0.77
be among most beneficial type of activity	0.77
be important in theatre	0.77
is important tools	0.76
is important astronmical tools	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(observation, is more useful)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(observation, is more useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(experiment, is useful)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than telescopes)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(evaluation, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(observation, is more useful)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(observation, is more useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(evaluation, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(evaluation, is useful)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(experiment, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(experiment, is useful)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(telescope, be more useful than telescopes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(telescope, be more useful than telescopes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(observation, is more useful)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(observation, is useful)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(observation, is useful)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(observation, is useful)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(observation, be important in theatre)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in theatre)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(observation, be important in theatre)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(observation, be important in theatre)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(observation, is more useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(evaluation, is useful)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(experiment, is useful)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(telescope, be more useful than telescopes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(observation, is more useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)