observation: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
is more useful 0.95
were helpful to early people 0.79
is important tools 0.77
is important astronmical tools 0.77
be important in theatre 0.77
is problematic 0.77
be useful in astronomy 0.77
be among beneficial type 0.76
be usefull 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(observation, is useful)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tool, be usefull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(observation, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tool, be usefull)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tool, be usefull)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experiment, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, is useful)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(outlier, is problematic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(observation, is useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tool, be usefull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(observation, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(evaluation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(evaluation, is useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(experiment, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(experiment, is useful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(outlier, is problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(outlier, is problematic)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(telescope, be useful in astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(telescope, be useful in astronomy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(observation, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(observation, is more useful)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(observation, is more useful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(observation, is more useful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(observation, be important in theatre)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in theatre)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(observation, is more useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in theatre)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(observation, be important in theatre)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(observation, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tool, be usefull)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(outlier, is problematic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(evaluation, is useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(experiment, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(telescope, be useful in astronomy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tool, be usefull)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(observation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)