observation: support development of children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
support development of children 1.00
support development 0.92
be important in study of child development 0.84
be necessary in curriculum development 0.77
support communication 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(observation, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be necessary in curriculum development)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(observation, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(evaluation, be necessary in curriculum development)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be necessary in curriculum development)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(observation, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(observation, support development of children)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(observation, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(observation, be important in study of child development)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(observation, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in study of child development)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(observation, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in study of child development)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(observation, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(observation, be important in study of child development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(observation, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(observation, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(observation, support development of children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(observation, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(observation, support development of children)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(observation, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(evaluation, be necessary in curriculum development)