odor: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.63
, characteristic
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, chemical
Weight: 0.56
Siblings smoke
Weight: 0.67
, mildew
Weight: 0.67
, smell
Weight: 0.61
, vomit
Weight: 0.45
, ammonia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
is chemical change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(odor, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chemical, has quality change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(odor, has quality change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(odor, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(odor, is chemical change)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(odor, is chemical change)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(odor, is chemical change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(odor, is chemical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(odor, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(odor, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chemical, has quality change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(odor, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chemical, has quality change)