office: be funded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents office building
Weight: 0.80
, warehouse
Weight: 0.66
, space
Weight: 0.63
, house
Weight: 0.63
Siblings post office
Weight: 0.79
, home office
Weight: 0.73
, branch
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be funded 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(post office, be funded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(post office, be funded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(office, be funded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(office, be funded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(office, be funded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(post office, be funded)