post office: be funded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents office
Weight: 0.79
, site
Weight: 0.69
, department
Weight: 0.68
, institution
Weight: 0.67
Siblings office building
Weight: 0.41
, home office
Weight: 0.40
, dental office
Weight: 0.39
, doctor office
Weight: 0.39
, police department
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be funded 1.00
get funding 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(post office, be funded)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(office, be funded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(office, be funded)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(police department, get funding)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(post office, be funded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(police department, get funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(police department, get funding)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(post office, be funded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(post office, be funded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(post office, be funded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(office, be funded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(police department, get funding)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(post office, be funded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(office, be funded)