officer: be in the miltary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.68
, other person
Weight: 0.63
, official
Weight: 0.63
Siblings warrant officer
Weight: 0.77
, vice president
Weight: 0.74
, executive
Weight: 0.72
, chairman
Weight: 0.71
, inspector
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in the miltary 1.00
be in military 0.85
is military 0.84
leave military 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(official, be in military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(officer, be in the miltary)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(official, be in military)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(official, be in military)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(official, be in military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(officer, be in the miltary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(officer, be in the miltary)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(officer, leave military)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(officer, leave military)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(officer, leave military)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(officer, leave military)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in military)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(officer, is military)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(officer, is military)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(officer, be in military)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(officer, be in military)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(officer, is military)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(officer, is military)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(officer, be in military)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in the miltary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(officer, be in the miltary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(official, be in military)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(officer, be in the miltary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(official, be in military)