officer: tap back of car

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.68
, other person
Weight: 0.63
, official
Weight: 0.63
Siblings warrant officer
Weight: 0.77
, vice president
Weight: 0.74
, executive
Weight: 0.72
, chairman
Weight: 0.71
, inspector
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
tap back of car 1.00
tap back 0.92
touch back of car 0.87
touch back of vehicle 0.83
touch back of cars 0.83
tap tail light 0.81
touch car 0.81
pull over cars 0.77
drive in cars 0.76
touch back 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(police officer, touch back of vehicle)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(officer, tap back of car)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(police officer, touch back of cars)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(officer, tap back of car)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(police officer, touch car)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(officer, tap back of car)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(officer, tap back of car)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(police officer, touch car)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(police officer, touch back of cars)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(police officer, touch back of vehicle)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(police officer, touch car)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(police officer, touch back of cars)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(police officer, touch back of vehicle)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(police officer, touch back of vehicle)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(police officer, touch back of cars)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(police officer, touch car)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(officer, tap back of car)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(officer, tap back of car)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(officer, touch back of car)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(officer, touch back of car)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(officer, touch back of car)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(officer, touch back of car)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(officer, touch back)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(officer, touch back of cars)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(officer, touch back of cars)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(officer, touch back of cars)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(officer, touch back of cars)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(officer, tap tail light)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(officer, touch back)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(officer, tap tail light)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(officer, tap tail light)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(officer, tap tail light)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(officer, touch back)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(officer, touch back)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(officer, tap back of car)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(police officer, touch back of vehicle)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(police officer, touch back of cars)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(police officer, touch car)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(police officer, drive in cars)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(police officer, touch back of vehicle)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(police officer, drive in cars)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(police officer, touch car)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(police officer, touch back of cars)