older people: be better than younger people at estimating

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young people
Weight: 0.79
, most people
Weight: 0.70
, many people
Weight: 0.65
, other people
Weight: 0.64
Siblings poor people
Weight: 0.37
, young woman
Weight: 0.37
, business people
Weight: 0.37
, young man
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than younger people at estimating 1.00
be better than younger people 0.90
be better than people 0.86
be happier than younger people 0.85
be more serious than younger 0.85
be richer than younger people 0.84
need fewer calories than younger people 0.83
vote more then younger people 0.82
vote more younger people 0.82
vote then younger people 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(older people, be better than younger people)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(older people, be better than younger people)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(older people, be better than younger people)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(older people, be more serious than younger)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(older people, be happier than younger people)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(older people, be more serious than younger)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(older people, be richer than younger people)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(older people, be more serious than younger)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(older people, need fewer calories than younger people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(older people, vote more then younger people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(older people, be happier than younger people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(older people, vote more younger people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(older people, be richer than younger people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(older people, vote more then younger people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(older people, need fewer calories than younger people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(older people, vote more younger people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(older people, be richer than younger people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(older people, be happier than younger people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(older people, vote then younger people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(older people, vote more then younger people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(older people, need fewer calories than younger people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(older people, vote more younger people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(older people, vote then younger people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(older people, vote then younger people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(older people, need fewer calories than younger people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(older people, be richer than younger people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(older people, be happier than younger people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(older people, be better than younger people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(older people, be more serious than younger)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(older people, vote more younger people)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(older people, vote then younger people)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(older people, vote more then younger people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(older people, be better than younger people at estimating)