onion: be better than white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shallot
Weight: 0.55
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, eggplant
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than white 1.00
cost more than last year 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(onion, be better than white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, be better than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(food, be better than white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(onion, be better than white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(onion, be better than white)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion, cost more than last year)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(onion, cost more than last year)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(onion, cost more than last year)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(onion, cost more than last year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(onion, be better than white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(onion, be better than white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be better than white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(onion, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be better than white)