onion: cost more than last year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shallot
Weight: 0.55
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, eggplant
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost more than last year 1.00
be better than white 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion, cost more than last year)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, be better than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(food, be better than white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(onion, cost more than last year)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(onion, cost more than last year)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(onion, be better than white)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(onion, be better than white)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(onion, be better than white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(onion, be better than white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(onion, cost more than last year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion, cost more than last year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be better than white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(onion, cost more than last year) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be better than white)